A couple of days ago, Announcing AWS Parameters and Secrets Lambda Extension appeared on the AWS What’s New site. The general thrust of the motivation behind this (providing an easier way to vend credentials securely to AWS Lambda functions) is something that’s absolutely needed, but I’m not sure that this approach will move the needle - and it confuses me.
My confusion stems from how different an approach this is to how AWS ECS does it. In June 2019, AWS ECS released support for specifying secret values to be provided to ECS tasks at runtime. These secret values are fetched at container launch and provided to the process running inside the container as regular environment variables. This is great because:
- 12 factor apps are encouraged to store configuration in environment variables
- Almost all application frameworks support it out of the box, integrating environment values into their own configuration management systems, e.g. how ASP.Net Core does it.
- Apps not using frameworks can access environment variables in a single line of code without requiring any dependencies.
- It mirrors how configuration can be injected by IDEs or Docker containers during local development.
I’ve been complaining about this for a while on Twitter:
In my imagined ideal state this configuration of secrets would become part
of the function configuration just like regular plain environment variables. So
the input to
UpdateFunctionCode would look something like this:
This would bring parity with AWS ECS to AWS Lambda and make porting apps between the two a breeze, with no configuration code changes required. In an even more perfect world, I would be able to define those secrets in AWS SAM (or CDK) and have SAM automatically add the least-permissioned policies to the IAM policy for the function, the same as it does for event sources, etc.
Less complaining, more demos
cloudenv. It turns YAML ideas into usable demos:
I just built it as a proof of concept to show that what I want is technically possible and demonstrates a better (IMO) dev experience. I measure better as:
- Fewer Lambda-specific things to learn (and get wrong)
- Easy enough that people will use it
Keen to hear from folks about why I’m wrong, what might work better, etc.